If you run or work at an architecture firm, you’ve probably never thought of your work as “research and development,” but within the tax code there’s a longstanding incentive that actually rewards many of the activities your team works on day-to-day. You might be solving structural complexities, designing for sustainability, and tailoring solutions to site-specific challenges — but up until 2023, the IRS could be skeptical of that kind of work.
That changed in May 2023, when a landmark ruling opened the door for architects to better qualify for one of the most valuable incentives in the tax code: the R&D tax credit. This shift could mean tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dollars in tax savings per year or more — just for the work you’re already doing.
Let’s break down what changed, what qualifies, and how your firm can benefit, starting now.
We’re in a pivotal moment for architecture. Between rising construction costs, the pressure to meet energy codes, and the demand for sustainable and efficient design, firms are constantly innovating — and often doing so without guaranteed outcomes.
The R&D tax credit was designed exactly for this kind of work. But until recently, the IRS didn’t always interpret the law in a way that favored architectural services. That changed with updated guidance in May 2023, which expanded eligibility for activities like:
This is a strategic opportunity for firms to offset costs, reinvest in talent and tools, and remain competitive in an increasingly technical field.
Architects often assume “research” must mean lab coats and patents. But the IRS now recognizes that architectural design frequently involves a structured process of experimentation and technical problem-solving.
Here are some common qualifying activities in architecture:
🧠 Quick Rule of Thumb: If you’re solving technical problems without an immediate guaranteed path forward, you may qualify.
To determine eligibility, the IRS uses a four-part test. Here’s how it applies to your firm:
This framework doesn’t require groundbreaking discoveries — just technical iterations with a clear and measurable goal.
A mid-sized architecture firm redesigned an aging public library to meet net-zero energy targets. They:
They kept detailed records and documented ~1,000 hours of qualifying time across 4 employees. After calculating wages, modeling software expenses, and engineering collaboration fees, their Qualified Research Expenses (QREs) totaled $180,000.
This one project alone yielded a total credit of $14,400.
The average architecture firm may be eligible to recoup 6.5% to 10% of their qualified research expenditures (QREs).
Qualified costs may include:
Startups or small firms under $5M in annual gross receipts may also offset up to $500,000 in payroll taxes—a powerful boost for early-stage firms, regardless of profitability.
Here’s how to move from “we think we qualify” to “we’re getting money back.”
Step 1: Identify Projects with Eligible Activities
Look for projects involving:
Good documentation is non-negotiable. Track:
Pro tip: Invest in a project management system (and use it!) like Monograph or Deltek.
Use payroll data, invoices, and project records to calculate:
Common Misconceptions That Hold Firms Back
Designing custom solutions, solving site constraints, and testing systems is R&D.
This credit isn’t just about compliance—it’s about capacity.
Firms often reinvest these savings in:
We make this simple for architecture firms. Our R&D credit team will:
You get expert support and you only pay if you can get a credit.
If you’ve completed even one project in the past three years that involved design iteration or technical experimentation, you may be leaving money on the table.
Schedule a free R&D review — we’ll walk you through it in under 30 minutes.
Matt Bechtold heads up TaxTaker's R&D credit practice. He has helped companies claim valuable Federal & State R&D credits for more than 10 years for a wide range of clients and industries, ranging from Fortune 500 companies to startups and medium-sized businesses.